https://ameblo.jp/genuine-adler-forever/entry-12735146020.html
Shared with
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD7uDM4UuSc
Keiko Kawazoe #48 "The Biden Family and the Rekindled Ukraine Gate - Is the Deep Darkness True⁉"*LIVE 2022.3.21
We are still in a situation where the war is still going on in Ukraine. The first thing I want to talk about here is my sincere condolences to all Ukrainians who lost their homes, their families, their loved ones, and their precious lives.2:13
On the other hand, the Russian government considers the war to be a defensive war, and while we can never approve of war actions, we are also deeply saddened by the loss of lives of military personnel and their families, those who lost their jobs because they were Russians, prominent musicians and artists who had to resign or be dismissed, athletes who lost their qualification to participate in international competitions, and all those who were killed or injured in the war. Our hearts go out to the innocent Russians who are suffering from this hysterical torment by the West. 2:50
I personally believe that Japanese people should not be part of the group tormentors.
And the world likes to label. Russia is evil, America is righteous, and even wars have labels.
So the war in Iraq has taken the form of a good war. This time in Ukraine, Zelensky, who is struggling, is treated as a hero.
And how about thinking about whether one is pro-Russian or neo-Russian, anti-Russian or anti-American, and how thinking in such a binary way may itself be brainwashing?
In the first place, who is Russia fighting against? Are the U.S., U.K., Europe, and NATO just providing arms? And who profits from the war? At the very least, we need to have that perspective. 3:46
I happened to catch a glimpse of a TV program, and there was a conversation between Secretary of State Baker and Soviet-era Mikhail Gorbachev, who said that NATO would not advance eastward, not even by 1mm. There was a scholar, I think it was a telephone interview, who said on TV in an open manner that "there was no such thing," "there is no such thing in the first place," and "it is Putin's delusion, it is horseshit. I think it was a phone interview.
I also heard that there were some people on the Internet who said, "There is no such story.
I didn't see it firsthand, and I'm not trying to back up Putin on that, but one thing I would like to tell you, and you can see this, 4:46.
This is an archive of a university called Central European University. This is the Central European University, which was founded by George Soros, who is not on good terms with Vladimir Putin and his colleagues. In this archive, there is "Document 119: Record of conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and James Baker, February 9, 1990. In fact, in the second and third paragrams, Baker says, "I understand that the Americans feel it is important to assure the Soviet Union and Europe that they do not expand one inch east of NATO's current military jurisdiction. Actually, what I know is that this is not a document signed by both sides, so it is not legally binding. However, this conversation did exist.
However, for those who are saying that there is no such thing, what do you see that makes you so sure that there is no such thing! I would like to first argue that there is no such thing.
However, another thing I can say is that it is true that this was a conversation between Gorbachev of the Soviet Union and the United States.
Considering that, I think what Mr. Putin and others are trying to say is that this is also the reason why they say it never happened.
This is a video speech that President Putin gave on February 23 to commemorate the "Day in Defense of the Fatherland" holiday
It is also true that "NATO promised our country that it would not expand an inch to the east. Again, we were deceived. In layman's terms, we have been abandoned. Indeed, it is often said that politics is dirty. That may be true, but not to this extent. Not this dirty.
This amount of rafting is not only contrary to the principles of international relations, but first and foremost, it is contrary to generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth? There are only lies and hypocrisy."
(6:57)
In case you are wondering, the Wilson Center in the US has a transcript of that same conversation between Mr. Gorbachev and Secretary of State Baker on February 9, 1990.
I also looked at this, and to my surprise, two pages that I thought touched on NATO were deleted.
If there are those who are saying that this is not the case, I think they should look for these deleted pages and see if they can find them before saying so. I am sure that this was done intentionally and in place, and I believe that the NATO crap was removed. I'm not sure why, because there was no other mention of NATO. 7:50
In any case, in this sense, it has been said all along that Russia has waged war on Ukraine rather than on it as a battleground, but my own other point is that while it is true that NATO has been hostile to the Soviet Union, there is another fact on top of that. NATO is trying to move toward a one-world government, and in fact, there are two kinds of people in NATO, military officers and military personnel, and we are in a kind of dual governance situation.
In short, many of you may have a stereotypical image of NATO as something that is very good, that you all help each other, but in fact, it is not. The purpose of NATO is what I always say is state capitalism, and countries that want to manage their assets within their countries, the representative of which would be Putin's Russia, are considered to be the enemy.
The people behind NATO are the center of the world's deep state, including the Rockefellers, the Kissinger Doctrine, all the royal families of Europe, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in the U.K., the CFR in the U.S., the Foreign Affairs Office in the U.S., and the Rockefellers in the U.S. And then there is the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations in the U.S., which is also involved, including NATO's military officers. 9:49
And let's look here, shall we? First of all, Mr. Putin, on February 23, he said this.
'At the end of the 1980s, the Soviet Union was weakened and then completely collapsed.' (omitted).
This left the existing treaties and agreements virtually ineffective. Persuasion and pleading would not help. What the hegemony, the powers that be, don't like is said to be archaic, outdated, and unnecessary.
On the contrary, everything they find beneficial is held up as if it were the truth of the Last Judgment, and they will push it roughly and by any means necessary, at any cost. Those who do not agree are brought to their knees."
In short, if there is such a thing as their values in Russia.
"It absolutely does not fit in the 21st century, it is not good.
The 21st century is the era of globalism, as Ambassador Mabuchi and others have always said, and it is moving in the direction of a unified communist revolution that does not need national borders, but the Russian side, at least Putin's administration, is saying no. In a sense, the Russian military and Putin's regime are fighting against the US, UK, NATO, and globalism, using Ukraine as a battlefield. 11:20
Biden is playing the role of a spokesman in that.
As I think I mentioned last time, Russia up to the Yeltsin era, the Soviet Union, and Russia after Putin's administration after May 2000 are different.
In the period up to Yeltsin, it is said that, in a sense, Washington was running the Soviet Union and Russia. In a sense, I think it is fair to say that the Biden administration, with Mr. Biden as its spokesman, is still working with the hope that this is the case. 12:03
By the way, I hardly ever watch TV, but there were a lot of weapons that I saw for the first time, I would say for the first time, or to a certain extent, for some reason, even though it was a really short time. Another thing I can say is that NATO refused to set up a no-fly zone over Ukraine. Biden has also said that he will never set it up.
In other words, they will not reject Russian air strikes in Ukraine. And, in fact, Mr. Zelensky said on March 4 that "NATO has given the green light for further airstrikes," which means that the military intelligence agencies of Western countries want to fly reconnaissance satellite planes and other equipment to see what the results of the new weapons are, and it seems that the U.S., Britain and the European powers are also helping Ukraine with money I think this is a situation where the military and intelligence agencies of the Western countries are flying reconnaissance satellites and other equipment to see what the results of the new weapons are, and the US, UK, and European powers seem to be helping Ukraine with money and even selling weapons. One of the weapons is the Stinger, which is sold from the U.S. to Ukraine. One of the weapons is the Stinger, which is sold to Ukraine from the U.S. It is one of the weapons that has been shown many times on TV, as if it were an advertisement, saying, "This is safe for militias. (Image omitted.) 13:25
And another, the Javelin. The Javelin has a 94% accuracy rate and is used by amateurs. Originally, John Ruud, who was selected as Acting Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security during the administration of George W. Bush, worked at Raytheon. Then, in October 2017, during the Trump era, John Rude was at Lockheed Marty National, and this Mr. Rude became a senior vice president. So he was nominated to be the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy at the Pentagon.
What I am trying to say is that this Javelin, certainly during the Trump era, these appointments were made, but when it comes to who sold it, it was Biden when he was Vice President. The Ukrainian military has 800 American-made Javelins to repel Russian tanks. So it was Mr. Biden who proposed the sale. So, we can say that Mr. Biden is one of the neo-conservatives. 15:09
(Image of weapon omitted)
The reason for this is that the U.S. has sold $100 million worth of weapons to Taiwan, and the weapons are from these two companies. So, it is not a very elegant thing to say. So, not to put it in a very elegant way, but I have a little impression that something like a real arms dealer is operating in Ukraine.
Another name that has come up is the Turkish military drone "Bilaktar TB2" and TB3, and this new one has satellite link function as well. The arms trade seems to be the furthest thing from our world, but the fact that it is being advertised on TV in this way is an extension of the current war in Ukraine, and perhaps even a major goal of the government of Turkey. 16:47
This is a bit off topic here, but I want to talk about this drone, the Tu-141 Strizh, which was used by the Soviet military in the late 1970s and 80s, and is a Soviet reconnaissance drone that has been used by the Ukrainian military since 2014. It's a very large drone.17:19
This drone went down in Zagreb, Croatia, from Ukraine, through Romania and Hungary. No one was killed, so we're talking about a loss of life on this one.
'A drone fell near our quarters near the Zagreb center. Why couldn't it be shot down by air defense, even though it was flying over Romania, Hungary, and Croatia, and no one noticed?" is the question.
And the prime minister of Croatia is also very angry, according to the person who was a spokesman for the Ministry of Defense of neighboring Serbia. In Europe, people watch soccer games by satellite and are happy or sad about the results, but no one could detect the drone. This drone, a MIG-21 monstrosity, is huge. He said it was suspicious that it took so long to fall in Croatia and no one detected it. We found out that this kind of problem is happening in different places than the war zone. So we don't know at this point if this was intentional.18:47
Ukraine has become a sample trader of raw weapons, in fact, I looked at the JETRO website to see what kind of events Ukraine was having. I was astonished to see that most of what was out as an exhibition in Kiev, Ukraine this September was about arms dealing.
One of the events was called Arms Unsecured, Arms and Security. And one of the events is called Arms Unsecured, or Arms and Security.
(omitted).
We've been doing this event for about 10 years, and this arms event has been getting bigger and bigger since Biden was vice president, and Lockheed Marty Corp. is in it.20:24
(omitted).
What the website of the event, Weapons and Security, says on its website.
"The 2014 Russian aggression against Ukraine led to an annual increase in the budget for defense and security, restoration of military infrastructure, development of the defense industry, expansion of military-technical cooperation and strengthening of the country's defense capabilities and security. First demonstrated at an exhibition by Ukrainian manufacturers, a number of defense products exhibited by foreign partners are now being used by the Ukrainian military in the war in eastern Ukraine... For eight years, the experience gained in combat is constantly being used to upgrade existing weapon systems and to develop new . accompanied by new developments." 22:01
It says the war has been going on for 8 years!
Ambassador Mabuchi has been saying this for a long time, and this is not what I wrote, but if you look at our website here, if you all read the English, you will understand.
So, I am saying that for the whole eight years, we have been buying (weapons) and upgrading them in the eastern part of Ukraine, in the Donbass place.
In case you are wondering, this year's event on weapons and security is going to have 255 Ukrainian companies.
(omitted).
The fact that Ukraine has been expanding its military for so long, and now that this weapons event is happening, you can imagine, can't you?
Someone said something like, "Ukraine should have expanded its military more.
I said, "No, they didn't. They have been expanding their military for a long time. It is Ukraine that has been expanding its military for a long time.
And as many of you know, Mr. Brzezinski was behind Mr. Obama during the Obama administration, and as I mentioned last time, he was the one who focused on crushing Russia or neutralizing Russia: 55
So, it was in this context that the Obama administration and the Biden administration, at least under the Obama administration, Mr. Biden went to Ukraine six times during his eight years as vice president. And he was also the one who came very much to encourage us to join NATO.
And during the 2014 coup d'état called the Orange Revolution, he visited Kiev three times and said cool things like, "The United States will never recognize Russia's illegal occupation of Crimea." Incidentally, the following year, Prime Minister Abe visited Ukraine at the strong request of the Obama administration. He promised a total of 300 billion yen in large-scale aid in the form of financial assistance and the renovation of sewage treatment facilities.
In any case, this Mr. Biden, who is now the president, is very close to Ukraine, as you can see from the testimony of this person.
Mr. Viktor Shokin. Former Prosecutor General of Ukraine. He was Prosecutor General for a little over a year during the time of Mr. Poroshenko, and in September 2019, when Mr. Zelensky became president, during the time of Mr. Trump, he submitted a sworn statement, 12 pages.
The reason why he did it is because there was an oligarch from Ukraine who was arrested in Austria, and Mr. Shokin submitted a sworn statement to prove his position on the matter. The content of the statement is surprising.
He clearly stated, "In Ukraine relations, it was Joe Biden, the vice president, who represented the United States."
Mr. Shorkin has since been fired.
The situation at the time of my dismissal was that I submitted a notification to the Congress at the request of President Plushenko. President Plushenko explained to me that he wanted me to resign because of pressure from U.S. government officials, especially from U.S. Vice President Biden. Biden threatened to withhold the $1 billion grant to Ukraine until I resigned." He also said that 26:45
further stated, "The official reason for my dismissal has been that I failed to protect my credibility from the public. But the truth is that I was fired because of my extensive knowledge of the corruption problems at the Ukrainian gas company Blizma. I believe that Blizma, of which Biden's son Hunter Biden was a board member, had the support of Joe Biden." So he also says. And 27:17.
Joe Biden publicly commented on my dismissal. And he did it proudly. He fired me. When I heard that, I was convinced that the reason for my dismissal was about the interests of Brisma and Biden himself. And President Poroshenko was not for patriotism. Poroshenko was only responding to what was asked of him, in the interests of the American Obama administration, American Vice President Biden, and others." (27:55)
I'm sure many of you know this story, but I'm sure this is the first time you've heard it from the Ukrainian side of the story.28:03
So, here's what I think is important.
In 2009, Mr. Hunter Biden became the de facto head of Rosemont Seneca Partners, which is an American investment firm, and he is the de facto head of the two top investment firms in the United States.
The year was 2009, when Mr. Biden became Vice President of the United States.
A few years later, in December 2013, he and a subsidiary of the Chinese government-affiliated Bank of China invested $1 billion to create Bohai Harvest RST (Bohai Huamei), a new US-China joint venture investment fund.
And the following year, in April 2014, he was appointed to the board of directors of Ukrainian natural gas company Brisma Holdings, and while Mr. Biden was running for president, various pieces of information, in short, the contents of Mr. Hunter's laptop, etc., came out, and he stepped down from the board. In this case, he was removed from the board of directors.
It is also said that he was the private agent and attorney for Mr. Ip Jianming (now missing), Chairman of CFFC China Energy, a People's Liberation Army-affiliated company, but this Chairman is now missing.
In any case, the Biden family's Ukraine-gate is very complicated, and China is involved, but another one of their partners is Mykola Zlotchevsky, the founder of Blissma, who was the former Minister of Environment of Ukraine.
I would like to ask, are oligarchs close to Mr. Putin bad people, and oligarchs close to Mr. Biden good people? I think that's what I'm asking.30:05
In case you are wondering, the Guardian is one of the most leftist media in the UK, and I laughed out loud at what the Guardian wrote.
Just recently, on February 27th, the Guardian published this piece about Mr. Hunter
'In 2018, as reported by Business Insider ...
Hunter Biden reportedly sought $2 million a year in bribes in Gaddafi-controlled Libya under the guise of helping restore Libyan assets frozen by the Obama administration."
Other than that, to be clear, there is a lot of information out there, so much so that it is being called Hunter Biden's hard drive to hell, and he was saying that his father, President Biden, had nothing to do with it, but the content that President Biden must have had more than enough to do with it, is coming out of the US But there are reports even from the major media in the U.S. that President Biden must have had more than enough to do with it.
In any case, Hunter Biden, the second son of President Biden, has made a huge fortune on the back of his parents' wishes, or rather, he has received money in the form of consulting fees, which is defined in the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) as an agent representing the interests of a foreign power "with political or quasi-political authority. It requires agents representing the interests of foreign powers "with political or quasi-political powers" to disclose information about their relationship with the foreign government and their activities and finances," and I think that means that nothing has been disclosed.
And, again, it was in the Guardian, and Professor Trasan Turri of the George Washington University Law School says.
'It's a way for the power elite to make tons of money, and Congress has never seriously tried to crack down on it. Children and spouses of powerful leaders continue to receive shelf payments from corporate and foreign interests, but we have never seen the likes of the corporations to Hunter Biden. We are saying something like, "His contracts far transcend the level we have known before. "32:28
A man with a son like this is president, and yet, is America just? I myself would say, "Yes. 32:38
The fact of the matter is that there are decent people in Ukraine who are putting out the shame of the US, and they have all been sanctioned. So, I don't see how those who are giving the right evidence should be sanctioned! That's what I think. 33:00
One more thing. I can't go into detail, but it is well known that Hunter Biden's Rosemont Seneca Partners since 2009 has been investing in a company called Metabiota. Metabiota is working with the Eco-Health Alliance, which is connected to the Wuhan ●● Institute.
We have information from the Russian military that Metabiota is a company that is providing various guidance to Ukrainian bio-institutes, and recently the Russian ambassador to the United Nations said at the UN, "No evidence.
They dismissed it as, "No evidence. "33:54
The fact of the matter is that there are dozens of biological research institutes in Ukraine that the U.S. Department of Defense is involved in, and primary documents are already available, but the UN says "no evidence.
What do you think about this?
In short, "Russia lies all the time." And if the U.S. side says, "It's fake," then they are right.
In fact, it's almost a fact that this company called Metabiota, and another one, the biggest one, Black & Veatch, is involved with the Pentagon, and they are working with a biological research institute in Ukraine.34:59
Then, it seems to have been removed from the internet, Google, etc., but it is an oyaback machine, meaning that it has since been removed from the internet. There are teams all over the world that are restoring things from the past in this way.
It is true that his son Hunter Biden's company has invested in Metabiota, and most importantly, Metabiota was selected as a technology pioneer by the World Economic Forum last year.
It can also be said that Metabiota is among the companies that the Davos Forum is happy to select.35:46
The mass media naturally does not report this kind of situation, but the US agency involved, the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency, is supposedly providing substantial funding to 11 biological research institutes in Ukraine, which borders Russia, including figures and data. So, the numbers and the data are out there.36:21
The WHO, for example, has reported that the risk of polio is very high in Ukraine, and that the incidence of diphtheria, tuberculosis, and measles, especially measles, has increased 100-fold since I don't know when. I am not sure if this is a natural virus or not, but I am inclined to think that it is man-made. 36:52
(Lecture announcement: moved to the end of this article)
39:10～
We still have a little bit of time, so when I thought about which region would be a good person to ask about NATO, I thought it would be someone from the former Yugoslavia.
The reason being is that they were not in the Warsaw Pact Organization, they were not in NATO, and Yugoslavia was thoroughly destroyed by NATO and the US military during the Kosovo conflict and many other things.
So, I can think of Serbia and other countries in that area, especially those that were badly hit by NATO, and I have gathered a lot of information about how Serbian people think about this war in Ukraine, and I will be able to introduce you at some time in the future, but one person is in Serbia. In Serbia, this is Mr. Vladimir Petkovic, a security expert who has been predicting for eight years that the Donbass problem would become a bigger problem if it drags on, and in his capacity as a former member of the Serbian National Assembly, a former co-chair of the Serbian and Montenegrin Defense and Security Assembly, this is what he is saying.
"It is true that after the collapse of the former Soviet Union, Ukraine not only failed to integrate its own people, but also that it had oligarchs at the head of each oblast, in a sense privatizing that oblast, and the central government did not have much influence and power. Also, Ukraine as a society as a whole failed to set its own priorities in a timely and quality manner. For example, what it means to be Ukrainian, whether to align with the West or the East, or whether to choose neutrality. The non-unification of the people is the biggest reason, followed by the very high level of corruption, like in other ex-communist countries." He said.
He has been covering many countries of the former Soviet Union, and I think he was able to convey to everyone how Ukraine used to be as a nation. 41:21
After the commercials, there will be a Q&A session.
Please watch the video for the rest.
0 コメント:
コメントを投稿